Friday, July 5, 2013

To Michael Savage (part 63)

Doc,

I was watching the fireworks yesterday on UWS of Manhattan and listening to your repeat show about
America's immune system deficiency. That's my feeling too.
O'Reilly is pro-amnisty, so what? He lost his spine long ago. Another one is Heraldo Rivera, who was faking his report from so called "overseas" before, remember? Somehow he survives. I wonder who he knows in verminic media.  From his voice I smell stink of liberal commy, it just comes true so bad. How he's in mostly conservative channel? As soon as he says anything conservative he squeezes a liberal stink right through it. he's also for amnesty. I wonder how many illegals those libs use in their households. Anne Coulter who in his program and she said "why we don't take people from Eastern Europe or Scandinavia? After letting her go he started laughing at it.
He's a real skunk.    
About the psychosis of libs; when they assume they're doing something to favor one group, such as implementing transgender "happy go lucky to sh.t wherever you want" law, they never think about others who are majority and who don't have problems with their gender. They take our right, they violate us, out privacy, our safety. Why rich people pretend they're on the side of the poor. Rush said it very clearly, everyone that I know knows that: to justify their money and to keep them safe from violent crowds. Do you think I'm rich? No, hell not. But I know mostly poor people, rich people do not socialize much with others they don't know. It don't make me mad, it don't make me hostile against them. They pay more taxes and give to charities. i appreciate that.
I can tell you about this so much and so differently that no one that you know can tell you.
My one hope is that God gave human an imagination and google glass is coming up. Everyone will wear it sooner and later. It will be good and it will be bad, but to me I can't wait. If my life as a white woman living in NYC pretty much from 1991 would be live-steamed, I would be retired, I could make changes that others can't, or, would be given an asylum in another country with good lifetime pay to improve their system.
About racism: of course blacks are more racist. If you see my daily low-key, mind-my-own-business life, you'll be surprised if blacks really wonted to be mixed. I'm more puzzled about this than before.
The mere fact that black people go to white people's countries all over the world, not the way around, says everything. Why do the poll? You can see a black man cursing me and another white woman passing by on Park Ave. on 60's and we both just pass by without reacting. Go to Harlem and curse a black person, see what happens.
It took be 22 years living in NYC to finally comprehend why people would choose to live in gated communities. When I came i was shacked to hear about it. I felt they were people's enemies. How dare they were to put a barrier between themselves and others, I thought. I didn't speak English and I'd go and stand by any group of people looked minority and hold their placards with them in protest, without knowing the particulars of protest or strike. I didn't care, they should be the "oppressed" ones.  Oh well,
I have so many proves that most minorities hate me because I'm white and whites don't don't give a sh.t about me, because it will make them look "bad." How one white can stand up for another? that don't happen here in NYC, or the America I've got to know for more than 2 decades.
About Zimmerman case: you say he is a wannabe, I say you don't know. I was an auxiliary police officer in mid. 90's in NYC. I didn't go 16 weeks training, pass a test and put a same police uniform on with no gun and did community service because I wanted something back. I never put it on my resumes, never wanted to became a policewoman, I just wanted to give to community. Even my friends would ask me why was I doing it? And, do you know that Police don't like the auxiliaries? they don't want you around anywhere. They don't want extra eyes, extra witnesses and different interpretation of events. Police itself calls them "wannabes."
If there would be the Google glass, we'd see what happened and taxpayer wouldn't pay for this trial. The question I have: what was he doing in that neighborhood? Was he a guest in one of the households? And if he was a guest, he didn't have enough candy in that house so in rainy day he went out to buy candy? Thais grown man and candy buying scenario is just not impressive for me.
What you're not being consistent about this is that you like to bring examples of "old days" on Utopia Parkway in Queens, where old grandma could go out at nights without fear, because police use to use
'deterrent." So what happened for your nostalgia for deterrent? He was a grown guy, he was recast against whites by calling Zimmerman "a cracker" and he put a fight. Don't you think, especially if you're "visiting" a family who lives in gated community, they're cautious about strangers roaming around? Plus, they have a neighborhood watch with armed people? Maybe you should be more cooperative and nicer to your surrounding if you're an innocent teenager, a grown man, craving for a candy in a rainy day? Maybe you should tell the man who stops you that you're visiting, telling who are you visiting and offer to share your candy, and maybe, just maybe, a good Samaritan like George Zimmerman  would take you to the house you're "visiting." Did this appeal to you as more "normal" behavior? I understand that you know more about guns that I know; how he had to have it ready is the matter of the law, but you don't know for sure and for sure there were already break-ins in that area.
So, go figure. One thing I know the victims parents will retire from this, Zimmerman will emerge broke for all his life. You can't go what "legal" and put a logic on it. Most criminals are not "criminally insane" they're crazy vermin. Too bad because of the dirty bloody money grabbing lawyers in this country present reason as an excuse, and succeed many time, unfortunately, logic took a back seat in courtroom. It's a theater and a joke, as far as I'm concerned. I can bring countless examples from my life, but without taped LIVE proof, everyone will just make money and victimize me more.
You should tell all the mothers who listen to you to tell their teenage sons full of raging hormones to not
run in gated neighborhoods in dark, rainy days going after "candy." You shouldn't give candy to your young children let alone have your grown son be depend on it. What about that for "bad mothering" ha? Is it logical? Will your son tell you he was doing a thing like that and you'dn't question his judgment? If kid would do that, you as a parent should spank him. What about that? Makes sense?
I'm done now.

So long.
 


No comments:

Post a Comment

Followers